Clinician copilot
AI Clinical Assistance
Decision support and documentation that lives inside the clinician's existing workflow.
Overview
AI Clinical Assistance gives clinicians a copilot for the work that surrounds the work — summarizing long charts, retrieving relevant evidence, drafting documentation, and triaging medical imaging so attention stays on the patient.
Every suggestion is grounded, auditable, and human-in-the-loop. The clinician remains the decision-maker; the system removes the friction around the decision.
Outcomes
- Less time on documentation
- Decision support grounded in evidence
- More attention on the patient

Capabilities
What AI Clinical Assistance does.
Chart summarization
Long histories distilled into the few things that matter for this encounter.
Imaging triage
Computer vision flags candidate regions in scans and ranks them by priority.
Evidence retrieval
Relevant guidelines and references surfaced in context.
Ambient documentation
Draft notes generated from the encounter for the clinician to review.
How it works
From integration to impact.
- STEP 01
Observe
The copilot reads the chart, prior imaging, and the live encounter context — read-only by default.
- STEP 02
Assist
It summarizes, retrieves evidence, flags imaging regions, and drafts documentation.
- STEP 03
Confirm
The clinician reviews and accepts. Nothing enters the record without a human in the loop.
See it in motion
AI triage on a live medical image.
Our vision models triage imaging in seconds, surfacing candidate regions, ranking them by priority, and handing the clinician a head start. Hover a detection to inspect it.
AI findings
- 94
Pulmonary nodule
Right upper lobe · high priority
- 87
Ground-glass opacity
Left lower lobe · moderate priority
- 71
Trace pleural effusion
Left costophrenic angle · low priority
FAQ
Common questions.
- Does the AI make diagnoses?
- No. It triages, summarizes, and surfaces evidence to support the clinician. Every clinical decision stays with the clinician.
- How does it avoid hallucinations?
- Outputs are grounded in the patient's own record and retrieved sources, with citations the clinician can verify in one click.
- Where does it fit in the workflow?
- It is embedded in the tools clinicians already use, so there is no extra tab or context-switch.
Explore the rest of the suite
From the blog
Healthcare AI
Why Healthcare Falls Behind
Clinical workflows, information systems, and specialist expertise all show the same structural strain. We review what the evidence says about each bottleneck, and what remains unproven.
ReadTelemedicine
What AI Actually Fixes in Remote Care, and What It Quietly Fails At
AI improves remote care through chronic disease monitoring and image-based screening, but symptom-checker triage remains unreliable, and infrastructure, not algorithms, decides whether any of it reaches low-resource settings.
ReadHealthcare AI
The FDA Is Regulating Less Clinical AI, and the Diligence Burden Just Moved to the Buyer
The FDA's January 2026 guidance narrows which clinical decision support tools it regulates. For health systems that used FDA clearance as a quality proxy, the evaluation burden now shifts to the buyer.
Read

